home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=90TT1232>
- <title>
- May 14, 1990: Business Notes:Takeovers
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
- May 14, 1990 Sakharov Memoirs
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- BUSINESS, Page 75
- Business Notes
- TAKEOVERS
- Raider, Raider, Go Away
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p> The '90s have spawned their first backlash movement against
- the merger mania of the '80s. Advocates of tough new
- antitakeover laws that are sprouting from Massachusetts to
- South Dakota claim that the legislation will prevent outsiders
- from looting local firms and throwing residents out of work.
- Critics are concerned that the rules will entrench inefficient
- corporate managers and drive investors elsewhere.
- </p>
- <p> The antitakeover trend got a big boost last week when the
- U.S. Supreme Court, in clearing the way for California to
- challenge the merger of two major supermarket chains, ruled
- unanimously that states can sue to prevent or undo
- anticompetitive mergers. "The court decision is a blockbuster,"
- says Robert Litan, a senior fellow at the Brookings
- Institution. "There are 50 loose cannons out there, 50 attorneys
- general who can now stop a merger."
- </p>
- <p> The most explosive example of how far states may go to repel
- raiders came two weeks ago, when Pennsylvania Governor Robert
- Casey signed into law the toughest antitakeover statute in the
- U.S. The sweeping measure requires an investor who holds 20%
- or more of a company's shares for less than two years to
- forfeit any profit on shares sold within 18 months of a failed
- takeover bid. The law would discourage takeover artists from
- launching a raid to drive up the price of a target company's
- stock and then selling out at a profit.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-